Zach Pierce, Senior Campaign Representative for Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal Campaign, says, “Renewable energy is leading the way in the transition away from coal to cleaner, more cost-effective electricity generation. It’s a promising development to see Xcel join a diverse group of stakeholders to explore taking advantage of low cost, clean energy. We look forward to engaging in an open and collaborative process to modernize our electric sector in a way that benefits local economies, improves public health, and conserves our environment.”
Although Comanche is located in Pueblo, CO, most of the electricity generated at the plant powers other communities. Pueblo does, however, suffer the worst effects from the pollution that spews from the smokestacks on the southeast side of town.
Local resident and active member of the Sierra Club, David Cockrell, says, “We have dreamed about the prospect of closing Comanche I and II for years, both for the reductions in CO2 emissions and for the local clean air benefits. But there are still many unanswered questions about the current proposal we have to look at concerning the mix of renewables to replace the coal plants, where they will be built, and what impacts the changes will have on local jobs and workers, and on local tax revenues. We are cautiously optimistic.”
In the event of plant closure, Xcel has signaled their intention to help impacted employees transition. Securing local economic development opportunities will be key to this proposal’s success.
Demand for renewable energy is growing throughout Colorado. The cities of Pueblo, Aspen, and Boulder have all declared their commitment to meet 100% of their electricity needs with the low cost clean energy sources that already employ more Coloradans than coal and gas combined.
Enviroshop is maintained by dedicated NetSys Interactive Inc. owners & employees who generously contribute their time to maintenance & editing, web design, custom programming, & website hosting for Enviroshop.