Cracking Covid’s Coverup Conspiracy


The Merriam-Webster dictionary definition of Conspire is to Plot or Contrive.

A History of Silencing the Truth about COVID-19

On December 30, 2019, Dr. Li Wenliang sent a message to doctors in Wuhan warning them about a deadly disease outbreak and advising them to wear protective clothing to avoid infection. He was arrested by the Public Security Bureau. Dr. Li was released from detention on Jan. 3 after he was forced to sign a statement about “making false comments” that had “severely disturbed the social order”.

The police document stated: ”We solemnly warn you: If you keep being stubborn, with such impertinence, and continue this illegal activity, you will be brought to justice – is that understood?” Dr. Li was forced to write: “Yes, I do” so he could avoid being jailed. He was just one of many people the police were intimidating with jail threats for “making false comments”.

On Dec. 31, Chinese authorities informed the World Health Organization (WHO) about the new pneumonia cases in Wuhan. They stated that ito came from wild animals in a wet market and that there was no evidence of human to human transmission, only animal to human transmission. The WHO parroted this information. This was the beginning of the falsified zoonosis (natural origins) narrative – that this virus came from an animal and did not leak from a laboratory.

Published research showed that Chinese authorities did not have (and still do not have) any evidence of animals infecting people in Wuhan with the new virus (SARS-CoV-2). This was a false story planted in the global media to coverup the truth. The evidence was clear that by Dec. 31 the Chinese authorities were informed about human to human transmission of a new lethal disease in Wuhan. That is why they threatened Dr. Li with jail for alerting other Wuhan doctors about this new dangerous and contagious SARS type disease.

It was the start of a litany of lies and deception that are still occurring today. This deception left the world unprepared to deal with the coming pandemic.

Dr. Li started coughing on Jan. 10, 2020, developed a fever the following day, and was hospitalized two days later.

On Jan, 20, China declared the outbreak an emergency. However people had been traveling from Wuhan to all areas of China and the world, especially during the month that led up to the Chinese New Year on Jan 25 when tens of millions traveled. This was the major super-spreader event that should have been avoided, if the truth had not been severely suppressed by the Chinese Government police-state apparatus.

Governments began closing their borders with China as the new disease started to be reported in many countries, in order to prevent infections. China and the WHO criticized these governments saying that there was no need to stop flights from China. The Chinese Government had everything under control.

It was only when the virus began to get seriously out of control, that the Chinese Government took the severe measure to lock down tens of millions of people in Wuhan and surrounding areas on Jan. 23. By this stage the virus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, had infected the whole world. It was a classic case of closing the gate long after the horse has bolted.

Dr. Li Wenliang died on February 6, 2020 from COVID-19. He will always be remembered as a hero for warning the world and breaking through the official Chinese Government coverup of this pandemic. The people who covered-up the truth and have enabled this unprecedented pandemic, that has destroyed the lives of millions through death, disease, crippling poverty and loss of freedom need to be called out and brought to justice for crimes against humanity. This pandemic could have been avoided if there was truth, honesty and transparency from the beginning instead of the litany of lies that suppressed the truth and facilitated the spread of this virus.

Dr. Li Wenliang in hospital before he died of COVID-19. A true hero whose bravery alerted the world to the dangers of the new coronavirus, despite the official coverup

Where did SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 come from?

Most governments and scientists are sticking with the official story put out by the Chinese Government and much of the international mass media that SARS-CoV-2, has a natural origin, even though after 18 months of searching, no natural host has been found. This coverup story is rapidly changing now that the journal Science has published a letter from 18 of the worlds leading virologists that the lab-leak theory must be investigated. Why did it take 18 months and an international backlash over the Chinese Government orchestrated WHO parody of an investigation?

The well-respected scientist, Jonathan Latham points out why:

If the [Wuhan Institute of Virology] lab has anything to hide, it is not only the Chinese Government that will be reluctant to see an impartial investigation proceed. Much of the work was funded by the U.S. taxpayers, channeled there by Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance. Virtually every credible international organization that might in principle carry out such an investigation, the WHO, the US CDC, the FAO, the US NIH, including the Gates Foundation, is either an advisor to, or a partner of, the EcoHealth Alliance. If the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak originated from the bat coronavirus work at the WIV, then just about every major institution in the global public health community is implicated.”

It is clear a lot of people and organizations had a lot to lose if it was revealed that SARS-CoV-2 was made in a lab and leaked out. There is very credible evidence that the central actor joining them together to conspire to hide the truth is Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance.

Huanan Seafood Market Story

The first zoonosis (natural origin) story concocted by the Chinese Government and blindly parroted by the WHO and most mainstream media was that SARS-CoV-2 came from bats sold in a wild animal wet market. This ‘wild animal wet market’ turned out to be the Huanan Seafood Market, a normal seafood market that sold fresh fish and some live animals, like many markets in China. It did not sell bats for food.

The first confirmed COVID-19 hospital patients had no contact with the Huanan Seafood Market, which ruled out the possibility that the market was the source of the virus.

The graph below comes from a peer-reviewed scientific paper published in the Lancet. The first recorded incidence of a patient with COVID-19 symptoms being admitted to a hospital occurred on December 1, 2019. This patient had no contact with the seafood market.

Nine days later, on December 10, 2019, three more patients were admitted to the hospital, two of whom had had zero contact with the seafood market. One patient had contact with the market. Five days later, two more people were reported sick after being at the market, however others who had had zero contact with the market continued to be admitted to hospitals. This data clearly shows that the Huanan Seafood Market was not the source of COVID-19.

The virus (called 2019-nCoV then and now called SARS-CoV-2) was circulating in the Wuhan community for at least nine days before the first reported case of a patient who had had contact with the market. The market cluster had came from an infected person visiting the market, and infecting stall holders and customers because of its crowded conditions. SARS-CoV-2 is an aerosol virus that is spread via fine droplets through normal breathing and talking. These fine droplets can stay suspended in the air for hours.

The market was closed down on January 1, 2020. Testing did not find any evidence of SARs-CoV-2 in the animals, only in the drains. This would have most likely come from infected people spreading this aerosol virus and the droplets eventually settling in the drains after the regular daily cleaning of the market – the natural effect of gravity settling things down to the lowest level.

On May 31, 2020, after months of insisting that COVID-19 originated in the Huanan Seafood Market, Gao Fu, director of the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, stated that no viruses were detected in animal samples at the market. At first, we assumed the seafood market might have the virus, but now the market is more like a victim.”

He stated: the novel coronavirus had existed long before.” This is consistent with the multiple studies showing that SARs-CoV-2 was circulating in Wuhan before any person was infected at the seafood market. Significant sections of the mainstream media still promote this discredited coverup story of wild animals sold in a wet market as the origin of this pandemic, despite the fact that there is zero evidence for this. They are spreading fictitious misinformation.

The Release of SARS-COV-2 Genome

The Chinese government refused to release the genetic sequence of the virus so that medical experts could develop tests to detect it and prevent the pandemic, despite repeated requests from the WHO and various national governments.

According to an article published in Time magazine on Aug. 24, 2020, China’s National Health Commission, the nation’s top health authority, gave an order on Jan. 3, seen by the respected Beijing-based finance magazine Caixin, that forbade the publishing of any information regarding the Wuhan disease.  Labs were told to destroy or transfer all viral samples to designated testing institutions. Caixin reported that several labs had processed SARS-CoV-2 sequences. None were published.

Despite knowing that many researchers had been jailed or threatened with jail, Professor Zhang Yongzhen defied the top health authorities Jan. 3 order and made the brave decision to let his colleague in Australia publish the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, globally, on Jan 11. He was initially strongly censured and his laboratory closed down. We have to recognize the important role of these brave Chinese scientists, researchers, doctors and journalists in putting out the truth, knowing that it will endanger their careers and could result in imprisonment.

The First  Paper

A paper published by two Chinese scientists, Botao Xiao and Lei Xiao, on Feb. 6, 2020, showed that there were no bats in the Huanan Seafood Market and that the only bats and bat viruses in Wuhan were at the Wuhan Center for Disease Control & Prevention and Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

This paper gave compelling evidence that the most likely source of COVID-19 was an accident at one of these labs, and that more research should be undertaken to determine if an accident at the lab was to blame for the pandemic. The Chinese Government used pressure to have this paper withdrawn, deleted and suppressed. They silenced the researchers.

However in the interest of transparency and freedom of speech, we are providing a link to the original paper as a copy was saved before the Chinese government tried to delete it.

These researchers have disappeared and are still widely discredited in the mainstream media. History will recognize them as part of the brave group of Chinese scientists who helped reveal the truth. Like Dr. Li and Professor Zhang, they are true heroes.

RaTG13 – the virus constructed to deceive and confuse

The zoonosis story was given another boost on Feb. 3, 2020, when Dr. Shi Zhengli, director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) published that a new coronavirus, RaTG13, was 96.2 percent similar to SARS-CoV-2. It was its closest relative.  RaTG13 stands for a Rhinolophus affinis (Ra) bat captured in Tong Guan (TG) in Yunnan Province in 2013, about 1,000 miles away from Wuhan. The main difference between RaTG13 and SARS-CoV-2 was the genetic make-up of the spike. They were very different.

Mojiang Mine and BtCoV/4991

Several scientists doubt that RaTG13 actually exists, questioning if it was collected in 2013, why its genetic information was not uploaded to the standard international data bases as WIV has done with its other coronaviruses. They have raised concerns why such a unique SARS type virus was totally unknown until it was published in Jan. 2020. This is regarded as unprofessional conduct.  Dr. Shi and Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance stated that RaTG13 was collected in 2013 stored in a freezer in WIV until it was tested for the first time in 2020. Then it was uploaded to a public database after publication.

A preprint paper showed that RaTG13’s genetic sequence is identical to a section of another bat coronavirus WIV collected in 2013, named BtCoV/4991. BtCoV/4991 was collected in a mine colonized by bats near Tong Guan in the Mojiang District of Yunnan Province. WIV researchers investigated the mine after six miners had contracted severe pneumonia and three had died in 2012. The miners have been cleaning out bat droppings from the mine.

In late July 2020, Dr. Shi Zhengli, confirmed the BtCoV/4991 was renamed RaTG13. She declared that the full sequencing of RaTG13 has been carried out in 2018 and not in 2020, after the SARS‐CoV‐2 outbreak, as stated in her paper published in February 3, 2020. The reversal in WIV’s stance on when exactly RaTG13 was fully sequenced was due to the discovery of information deposited by WIV on May 19, 2020 by independent researchers, that indicated that sequencing for RaTG13 was done in 2017 and 2018.

This changing of the story about the origins of RaTG13, raised a lot of suspicions with researchers. Why hide the truth about the origins of this virus and publish a paper about it using a different name and make a false statement about when they first knew about it?

Questions were raised in various forums asking if the severe pneumonia that killed the three miners in 2012 was caused by a SARS related coronavirus like BtCoV/4991. Dr. Shi stated that the miners tested negative for viruses and had fungal infections.

DRASTIC, a collective of independent scientists and researchers, uncovered a Master Thesis from 2013 and a PhD from 2016 that showed that four miners’ samples subsequently underwent testing at WIV, where they tested positive to viral antibodies, contradicting Dr. Shi’s claims.

Shi produced an Addendum to the Feb. 3 paper on Nov. 17, 2020 stating that 13 sera were collected from 4 patients and that they tested negative for Ebola, Nipah and for the bat SARSr-CoV Rp3. She wrote that WIV researchers detected 293 highly diverse coronaviruses of which nine betacoronaviruses were SARS related viruses in Mojiang. One of the samples was BtCoV/4991 that was renamed RaTG13.

In May 2021, DRASTIC researchers found a PhD thesis from 2014 by a WIV student stating that 30 sera were obtained in total, not 13. The thesis is also described that a total of 170 bat samples were collected from Mojiang in 2012, of which 109 tested positive for coronaviruses, a positive rate of 64%. The researchers detected BtCoV/4991 in the spike of coronavirus samples.

This PhD thesis clearly shows showed that the addendum is not correct and misrepresents the scale of the Mojiang miners’ investigation. It shows that Shi is constantly making up new origin stories to plug the holes in her narratives as the previous stories are shown to be incorrect. It is obvious, given the series of false information and contradictions that Shi is lying and covering up the truth about the origins of SARS-CoV-2.

RaTG13 a Fabricated Virus

Other researchers have been analyzing the genetic code of RaTG13 and have found a range of discrepancies. These are good evidence that it has been been fabricated.

They have found poor quality data, incomplete sequence data and incoherent structures described in the original paper published on Feb. 3, 2020.  Furthermore, three different versions of the RaTG13 that were uploaded to GenBank reveal inconsistencies in their genetic sequences.

DRASTIC researchers recently found the whole genetic code of BtCoV/4991 and compared it with RaTG13. They found that they don’t match in some key areas. This shows that the statements by Shi that BtCoV/4991 and RaTG13 are the same, are untrue.

RaTG13 looks like a fabricated virus. Shi stated that the original sample of RaTG13 was used up in the sequencing it and that it does not exist anymore. There is no evidence that it ever existed apart from as a set of letters published in a journal. The evidence is strong due to the inconsistencies in its set of letters, that it is a fabricated virus, made up by Shi and researchers at WIV to mislead scientists about the origins of SARS-CoV-2.

Why has Dr. Shi lied about RaTG13 and tried to cover up the facts about BtCoV/4991 and the other viruses they collected and took back to WIV?  Why won’t they release the information aboutthese potentially deadly SARS type viruses so they can be studied by independent virologists to see if they are related to SARS-CoV-2? Instead of being fully transparent and open by providing the evidence requested by virologists, Dr. Shi and WIV, deleted the coronavirus databases and destroyed the lab records. This is clear evidence of a coverup and that they have something to hide.

These multiple discrepancies and evasions clearly show that they are conspiring to coverup the truth, rather than being open and transparent about the origins of SARS-CoV-2.


Soon after the publication of RaTG13 in Feb. 3, 2020 researchers published 2 papers about a coronavirus with a spike protein nearly identical to spike of SARS-CoV-2. This was found in one Malayan Pangolin that was confiscated from smugglers at the Chinese border. However the rest of this pangolin virus is quite different from SARS-CoV-2.

Several researchers published papers stating that SARS-CoV-2 is a result of the natural recombination of the spike protein of the Malayan Pangolin coronavirus into the ‘backbone’ of RaTG13. They proposed that pangolins were the intermediate host between bats and humans, and that SARS-CoV-2 was a result of a bat infecting a pangolin with RaTG13.  It combined with the pangolin virus to make the chimera – a new virus composed of 2 existing viruses. This was the new zoonosis story. The genesis of SARS-CoV-2.

U.S. Right to Know scientist, Dr. Sainath Suryanarayanan found serious anomalies in the viral sequence data of these papers, resulting in the authors making corrections to their data sets. The scientific journal put a heading on one of the papers stating that it needs further correcting and checking for accuracy of the data. Dr. Suryanarayanan requested the original data to check the truthful accuracy of the researchers claims that the section of the pangolin spike protein is nearly identical to the SARS-CoV-2 spike. The corrections could just be fictional changes to make the pangolin data look accurate after Dr. Suryanarayanan pointed the problems with the evidence that they published. This data has not been supplied so the evidence presented in these papers cannot be regarded credible and needs to be treated as unreliable and most likely false. Hiding the original data is regarded as academic malpractice and is the grounds for having a paper retracted.

Another scientist, Dr. Zhang, the discovered synthetic DNA sequences in the pangolin coronavirus data. This is evidence that the pangolin coronavirus genome was generated in a laboratory and is not natural. The pangolin papers should be withdrawn and the authors censured for academic fraud.

Thanks to the work of independent researchers, the web of false published information put out to promote that SARS-CoV-2 evolved naturally from wild animals is unraveling. The shared data sets, the timing of published papers and corrections to the RaTG13 and pangolin papers reveal that authors created unnatural viruses. They were conspiring together to build the narrative that SARS-CoV-2 was a result of the natural combination of the pangolin and bat viruses. This has now been shown to be a deceptive manipulation to mislead and hide the real origins. There are enough inconsistencies in these papers that under normal circumstances they would be withdrawn by the scientific journals. This has not happened showing the journals are complicit in the manufacture of the false Zoonosis cover stories.

EcoHealth Alliance Orchestrated Coverup

U.S. Right to Know uncovered emails showing that Peter Daszak, President of the EcoHealth Alliance orchestrated the statement by scientists, to promote natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 and discredit the lab origins, that was published in the Lancet on Feb.18, 2020.

The statement in the Lancet by 27 prominent scientists that condemned the conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin” was organized by the EcoHealth Alliance. The emails show that the scientists had no evidence to support their claims and that they suppressed any suggestion that a lab-leak is a possibility.

The EcoHealth Alliance has received over one hundred of million of dollars of U.S. taxpayer money, much of which came from Anthony Fauci’s NIAID, the U.S. NIH and the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Over the years they have spent millions of dollars funding Gain-of-Function (GOF) experiments at WIV that genetically manipulated coronaviruses in multiple ways.

The WHO, the U.S. CDC, the United Nations FAO, the U.S. NIH and the Gates Foundation are either an advisor to or a partner of the EcoHealth Alliance. Peter Daszak funded numerous Gain-of-Function experiments at WIV and coauthored numerous papers with Dr. Shi, including several that created synthetic coronaviruses and chimeric coronaviruses with new spikes that could infect people using GOF genetic engineering. Both he and Dr. Shi worked with Dr. Ralph Baric who invented the ‘No See’m’ technology of creating synthetic coronaviruses that leave no traces of genetic engineering. Baric worked closely with Shi at WIV to create new genetically engineered viruses via GOF experiments.

The emails show that Peter Daszak drafted the Lancet statement, and that he intended it to not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person” but rather to be seen as simply a letter from leading scientists”. Daszak wrote that he wanted to avoid the appearance of a political statement”. Ralph Baric participated in the discussions however it was decided to hide his involvement. This activity is a textbook description of the definition of Conspire – to Plot or Contrive. It was a conspiracy to deceive and hide the truth.

Baric, Daszak and the EcoHealth alliance scientists were actively involved with Dr. Shi’s experiments to create genetically engineered coronaviruses in the low security level 2 lab at WIV, instead of doing these dangerous experiments in the high security level 4 lab.

Bottom images – Baric, Daszak and Shi (far right) at the Wuhan Institute of Virology before the COVID-19 pandemic at a conference on viral diseases.

In an interview in November 2019, just before the news of the new dangerous coronavirus epidemic at Wuhan became public, Daszak described the work he funded that was being done by Shi and Baric on coronaviruses at WIV:

You can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily. Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus, zoonotic risk. So, you can get the sequence, you can build the protein, and we work with Ralph Baric at UNC to do this. Insert it into a backbone of another virus, and do some work in the lab.”

They knew that multiple new dangerous coronaviruses that can infect people were being created in a low security lab at WIV. The emails show that they actively conspired together to hide this and promote the false zoonosis theory.

The 27 researchers who conspired to write this letter stated that theystrongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” and reported that scientists from multiple countries overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife.” The evidence show that these statements are false. They were written to deceive the media and the public that a leak of a genetically engineered virus from a low security lab at WIV is a credible cause of the COVID-19 pandemic and not a conspiracy theory. These scientist still do not have any evidence to overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife.”

The Lancet failed to disclose that four other signers of the statement also have positions with the EcoHealth Alliance. This is a classic case of conflict of interest. Not declaring these types of conflicts is regarded as academic malpractice and should result in the retraction of paper or statement. The Lancet has ignored requests to respond to this academic malpractice, making them complicit propagating disinformation

The Lancet letter was used by Daszak to push the lab-leak origins as crackpot theories in the media around the world, causing the media and industry to ridicule any scientist or commentator who chose to state that it should be considered as a real option. Daszak wrote an opinion piece in the Bill Gates funded Guardian newspaper, where he said that the lab-leak was crackpot theories that need to be addressed,” The Guardian refused to publish any responses that refuted his claims, showing that they ignored the principles of reasonable and balanced journalism. Most of the mainstream media and scientific journals have now run multiple articles and scientific papers showing that the lab-leak origins of the COVID-19 pandemic are credible, including Daszak’s active role, however the Guardian is silent.

The Lancet COVID-19 Commission – A Coverup Commission

On Nov. 23, The Lancet COVID-19 Commissionwas formed to uncover the origins of SARS-CoV-2 The chairman of the new 12 member task force to investigate the Origins, Early Spread of the Pandemic, and One Health Solutions to Future Pandemic Threats” is Peter Daszak.

Half of the task force members, including Daszak, Hume Field, Gerald Keusch, Sai Kit Lam, Stanley Perlman and Linda Saif, were also signatories to the Feb.18 Lancet statement showing that they already decided on the outcome before the investigation has even begun. This undermines the credibility and authority of the task force. It clearly shows that Daszak is actively conspiring with others, including the Lancet, to orchestrate the lab-leak coverup by pushing the false zoonosis story. It can be seen that these Gain-of-Function virologists have formed a cartel to manipulate information and suppress the truth.

The Discredited WHO/Chinese Government Investigation

The World Health Organization Commissionto find the origins of SARS-CoV-2 visited Wuhan in late January 2021.

This investigation was proposed by Australia. China immediately retaliated by imposing severe trade sanctions and threatening other countries with the same to prevent the investigation. Eventually in May 2020 the World Health Assembly requested that the WHO Director-General work closely with partners to determine the origins of SARS-CoV-2. Unfortunately, China was given a controlling veto over the participants, the timing and the content by the WHO. After more than a year since the first infections in Wuhan and several false starts, a team hand-picked by Chinese authorities were taken on a stage-managed tour around the sites of Wuhan including the closed Huanan Seafood Market and a brief visit to WIV.

The delegation were only allowed to receive spoon-fed information by the Chinese authorities. They were refused all the raw data and only given selected information that had been compiled and sanitized for them. The delegation only included one hand-picked scientist from the U.S., Peter Daszak. The Chinese vetoed all the other U.S. scientists who applied.

Peter Daszak arriving at the Wuhan Institute of Virology with members of the WHO Commission

Daszak actively promoted the wild animal origin and dismissed the lab-leak. They had a quick visit to WIV, enough time for a nice cup of tea and pleasant chat. Why did they dismiss a leak from WIV? Daszak said they asked them and they said that it did not leak from WIV. That was the ‘evidence’. There was no investigation.

According to the BBC on Feb. 9, Daszak spoke about the focus on the origins of SARS-CoV-2 being shifted to South East Asia. “We’ve done a lot of work in China and if you map that back it starts to point towards the border and we know that there is very little surveillance on the other side in the whole region of South East Asia.”

This shows that Daszak, hand-picked by the Chinese authorities as the only American on the commission, was actively pushing the Chinese Government’s line that SARS-CoV-2 originated outside of China and not in Wuhan. There is zero evidence that it originated anywhere other than Wuhan. Once again, and in conjunction with Chinese authorities, Daszak was actively conspiring to coverup up the truth.

The WHO Commission produced no information that would be useful in determining the origins. In the end the hand-picked Chinese and visiting scientists voted on the four likely outcomes with zoonosis as the most likely and the lab-leak as extremely unlikely. The discredited Chinese Government’s proposal that SARS-CoV-2 came to Wuhan via imported food came higher on the list, which showed that the investigation was just an orchestrated piece of Chinese political propaganda. It was a total farce.

The Chinese theatre to show-case their imported food origins of SARS-CoV-2 to the world backfired. The investigation was seen as an embarrassing parody and a stage managed sham that caused outrage around the world. Scientists, journalists and commentators demanded a new, fully independent investigation. The United States, the 27 counties in the EU along with 13 other countries called for a new, fully independent investigation that included the lab-leak as a credible option. Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus, the Director-General of WHO, went from defending the WHO Commission to calling for a new independent investigation that included the lab-leak.

Consequently a letter published in Science Magazine on May 14, 2021 by 18 of the world’s leading virologists stated;

“We must take hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers seriously until we have sufficient data. A proper investigation should be transparent, objective, data-driven, inclusive of broad expertise, subject to independent oversight, and responsibly managed to minimize the impact of conflicts of interest. Public health agencies and research laboratories alike need to open their records to the public. Investigators should document the veracity and provenance of data from which analyses are conducted and conclusions drawn, so that analyses are reproducible by independent experts.”

One of the signatories was Ralph Baric, who secretly conspired with Daszak on the Lancet statement to discredit the lab-leak origins. It remains to be seen if Baric is genuine or a trojan-horse. Dr. Shi has stated that she opposes opening up the WIV records on the basis of national security and because ‘there is nothing to be found’. Her refusal to participate in an independent international investigation shows that WIV has much to hide about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic.

DRASTIC, USRTK and other independent investigators.

The conspiracy to discredit and hide the lab-leak origins and push false zoonosis origins was uncovered by many independent researchers, scientists and journalists.

Yuri Deigin, a scientist with a strong research background in genetics started to research the lab-leak as a crackpot theory in 2020.  The more he looked into the scientific literature, the more his alarm bells rang that a lab-leak may be the most plausible origin of the COVID-19 pandemic. He wrote a key article published in the Medium, outlining multiple credible areas of research that showed that a lab-leak should not be ruled out. This well researched paper inspired other scientists and researchers to form DRASTIC, “Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating COVID-19.”

DRASTIC members uncovered and researched numerous papers to reveal the trails of deception and untruths that have conspired to keep the real origins of SARS-CoV-2 hidden. Several members have published peer-reviewed scientific papers with credible evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was created in a lab and leaked.

U.S. Right to Know (USRTK) uncovered the email trails that showed the conspiracy of Gain-of-Function virologists to hide the evidence of a lab-leak and promote a false zoonosis narrative. They also uncovered the false evidence in the pangolin papers.

Many scientists have published papers that build a compelling body of evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is a laboratory made virus and not a natural virus found in the wild.

Journalists such as Josh Rogin, uncovered the dangerous safety issues at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The world owes a debt to these independent scientists, researchers, journalists and the few media outlets that were prepared to inform the public about the truth.

The Chinese Heroes

Dr. Li Wenliang, Professor Zhang Yongzhen, Dr. Botao Xiao, Dr. Lei Xiaoand Zhang Zhan are examples of heroes who risked their lives, careers and safety to defy the oppression of the Chinese Government to tell the truth.

Dr. Li Wenliang died as a result of his actions to warn the world. Dr. Botao Xiao and Dr. Lei Xiaowho wrote the first paper on lab-leak from WIV have disappeared.

Zhang Zhan is a brave journalist who was jailed for four years telling the truth. She posted firsthand accounts of the beginning off the pandemic in Wuhan that showed the early outbreak was significantly more severe than the official government propaganda. She was jailed for “picking quarrels and provoking trouble.”

Due to harsh censorship laws and a lack of open and free media, it is impossible to know how many others have been jailed. NBC News reported that other citizen journalists who reported from Wuhan during the early days of the pandemic have been targeted.  Fang Bin, who shared videos from Wuhan’s hospitals on YouTube, has been missing since February 2020.

The South China Post reported that Chen Qiushi, who disappeared in February after making a series of social media posts, is under close surveillance and has not spoken publicly. Li Zehua, from Wuhan, re-emerged in a YouTube video in April after having disappeared for almost two months to say he had been forcibly quarantined.

We are in debt to these brave heroes for doing their part in breaking open this conspiracy to suppress the true origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Coverup Conspiracy is Cracking-Up

In the west dissenters are rarely jailed, just censored, silenced and ridiculed as conspiracy theorists. Stories about Gain-of-Function experiments, lab-made viruses and lab-leaks were heavily censored and those promoting them were attacked and ridiculed as crackpots. This was enough to silence most scientists and researchers as it could easily destroy their careers.

Articles and videos about lab-leaks and SARS-CoV-2 being the result of GOF are still deleted from FaceBook, LinkedIn and YouTube. The Bill Gates funded NewsGuard specifically targets posts and organizations that put forward the credible evidence about a lab-leak and GOF experiments. Consequently, many of the people who posted them have been de-platformed and their accounts deleted. Scientists who wrote to journals such as the Lancet and Nature, the accepted method of scientific critique of published articles, were not published if they pointed out the problems with the false-zoonosis anti-lab-leak stories. The scientists who wrote papers on why SARS-CoV-2 was a laboratory construct, were mostly rejected for publication or severely edited to lessen the impact of the paper as well as being heavily criticized and ridiculed in the media.

However, after 18 months, no credible evidence for a zoonosis origin of SARS-CoV-2 has emerged. By this time in the SARs and MERs epidemics, researchers had found clear evidence of the virus evolving in animal hosts and adapting so that it could infect people. No such evidence exists for SARS-CoV-2. It was highly adapted to infect humans from the beginning and is continuously evolving to become more infectious and lethal. There is no intermediate virus with its unique inserted furin cleavage spike found in nature.

A significant section of the mainstream media are starting to run articles on why a lab origin and leak in Wuhan is a plausible cause of this pandemic and should be investigated. The WHO will start to investigate it again. Many scientists have changed their minds as the evidence strongly favors a lab-leak. Governments are taking it seriously. It is no longer the crackpot theory put out by Daszak and his cartel of Gain-of-Function conspirators in their global disinformation campaign.

The evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was made in a lab is overwhelming. It has an insertion in the spike that is not found any other coronaviruses in its section, the SARS group. This insertion, called a Furin Cleavage Site, allows the virus to attach to ACE2 receptor to infect people. It is unique as it is the only furin cleavage site on a coronavirus that uses 2 human-preferred sections of genetic code, called codons, instead of the normal coronavirus-preferred codons. These types of human-preferred codons are used in Gain-of-Function experiments in labs. There are no natural coronaviruses with this genetic combination that have been found in the wild. This is the smoking gun that SARS-CoV-2is a lab creation and not a natural virus. (Link to my previous article)

The multiple conspiracies of the Chinese Government, Dr. Shi of WIV, Anthony Fauci of NIAID, and Peter Daszak’s cartel of Gain-of Function virologists covering up the truth, suppressing information, conspiring on Commissions and publishing articles to actively stop an open and transparent inquiry into WIV, have been cracked wide open.

Fauci was caught red-handed lying to Senators Rand Paul and Roger Marshallin Congress (add links) by denying that the money he gave Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance was used for Gain-of Function research. There are multiple published papers from WIV showing how they took harmless bat viruses and modified them so that they could infect people. This is classic Gain-of-Function experimentation. Daszak is on record in an interview and also from the multiple papers that he co-authored with Shi, that WIV conducted extensive GOF experimentation that was funded byFauci’s NIAID.

It is important to note that in exposing the roles of the Chinese Government and the Wuhan Institute of Virology that we must not be anti-Chinese or anti-Asian. Criticizing a government or an institution should never imply that the people of that country are to blame. They are victims like the rest of us. It is clear that Anthony Fauci’s NIAID, Peter Daszak and his EcoHealth Alliance, GOF scientists, DARPA, The WHO, Lancet, Nature, FaceBook, the Gates funded NewsGuard, Guardian and Linkedin as well as the mainstream and social media organizations who conspired to coverup the truth, are just as culpable as the Chinese authorities and Dr. Shi.

On the other hand, many very brave Chinese researchers, scientists, doctors and journalists risked their lives and are still taking great risks to reveal the truth to world.

The people and organizations involved in these conspiracies to coverup the truth are morally, ethically and financially responsible for this pandemic and its atrocious cost in lives, health, income, poverty and freedom.

If the WIV and the Chinese Government had been honest about the lab-leak in Wuhan, from the very beginning, SARS-CoV-2 could have been contained like the original SARS and MERs coronaviruses were, preventing this pandemic. The conspiracy to coverup the truth is the cause of this pandemic and the conspirators need to be brought to justice for crimes against humanity, so this never happens again.


I would like to thank the following people for the research they published to reveal the truth: Yuri Deigin, Rosanna Segreto, Billy Bostickson, The Seeker, The members of DRASTIC, USRTK, Nicholas Wade, Bernd Kaina, Josh Rogin, Alina Chan, Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, Jonathan Latham, Allison Wilson, Meryl Nash, Richard Ebright, Li Wenliang, Zhang Yongzhen, Botao Xiao, Lei Xiao, Zhang Zhan and many others. History will thank you as heroes.

Enviroshop is maintained by dedicated NetSys Interactive Inc. owners & employees who generously contribute their time to maintenance & editing, web design, custom programming, & website hosting for Enviroshop.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *