The HSUS Denounces FDA Approval Of Food Products From Cloned Farm Animals And Their Offspring

In a significant setback for animal welfare, the Food and Drug Administration announced that it will allow meat and milk from cloned animals and their offspring into the food supply.

"Despite the fact that cloned animals suffer high mortality rates and those who survive are often plagued with birth defects and diseases, the FDA did not give adequate consideration to the welfare of these animals or their surrogate mothers in its deliberations," said Wayne Pacelle, The HSUS' president and CEO. "Furthermore, no regulations exist in the United States that protect farm animals during cloning research."

In December 2007, both the House and Senate passed legislation responding to consumer concerns about the FDA's impending approval of these products. The House and Senate approved language — signed into law as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act (PL 110-1610) that strongly encourages the FDA to complete a study with the USDA and maintain the voluntary moratorium on meat and milk from cloned animals and their offspring.

The Senate also approved a provision in December as part of its Farm Bill (HR 2419), introduced by Sens. Barbara A. Mikulski, D-Md., and Arlen Specter, R-Pa., requiring additional studies by both the USDA and the National Academy of Sciences before the FDA can issue a final decision.

Mikulski wrote the following in a letter to FDA Commissioner Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach: "There is no urgency to issue a final decision, but there is a potential for unintended consequences if the FDA acts too quickly."

A review of recent cloning research studies reveals that many of the animals involved suffered from a wide variety of maladies. High failure rates, including stillbirths and premature deaths, occur on a regular basis, and such abnormalities as intestinal blockages; diabetes; shortened tendons; deformed feet; weakened immune systems; dysfunctional hearts, brains, livers, and kidneys; respiratory distress and circulatory problems are all too common.

A 2005 review of cloning procedures in cattle found that only about 6 percent of all cloned embryos transferred into recipient cows survived, confirming that the process remained highly inefficient. Many surrogate mothers used in farm animal cloning research also suffer from reduced welfare from fetal overgrowth, repeated surgeries and injections, and pregnancy complications that have resulted in death.

In June 2005, an FDA representative said that cloned animals were more likely to suffer birth defects and health problems. Following the FDA's release of its draft risk assessment on animal cloning one year ago, the agency received about 150,000 comments strongly opposing the agency's preliminary approval of meat and milk from cloned animals and their offspring.

A 2005 poll conducted by the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology found that 66 percent of American consumers are uncomfortable with animal cloning, in general. Earlier public opinion polls revealed similar apprehension about cloning.

Some companies previously announced that they would eschew meat and milk from cloned animals in their products regardless of what the FDA ultimately decides. The nation's largest processor and distributor of dairy products, Dean Foods, said that "[n]umerous surveys have shown that Americans are not interested in buying dairy products that contain milk from cloned cows and Dean Foods is responding to the needs of our consumers." Smithfield Foods, the nation's largest pig producer and previous funder of a pig cloning subsidiary of ViaGen, the leading farm animal cloning company, announced that its decision not to produce meat products from cloned animals was based not on consumer concerns but rather on the fact that "[t]he science involved in cloning animals is relatively new."

"The Humane Society of the United States supports scientific advancement, but cloning lacks any legitimate social value and decreases animal welfare," said Dr. Michael Greger, The HSUS' director of public health and animal agriculture. "The FDA's reckless action is completely unwarranted and unacceptable."

Enviroshop is maintained by dedicated NetSys Interactive Inc. owners & employees who generously contribute their time to maintenance & editing, web design, custom programming, & website hosting for Enviroshop.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *